Wholesale inventories came in today at +0.3% compared to a Bloomberg Econoday Consensus Estimate of -0.1%.
The entire range was -0.4% to +0.3% so a small number of economists, most likely one, got the number correct.
That’s not what caught my eye, however. What did catch my eye was an absurd Bloomberg statement about inventories heading into the report.
From Econoday:
Highlights
Wholesalers had been keeping their inventories down as sales have slowed but they got behind in January. Inventories rose 0.3 percent in the month which isn’t alarming in itself but relative to sales, which fell 1.3 percent, inventories look heavy. The stock-to-sales ratio rose two notches to 1.35 from 1.33 for the highest reading of the recovery, since April 2009.
Industries where inventories rose relative to sales include furniture, farm products, computers, and autos. Very few industries at the wholesale level show leaner levels in the month.
Year-on-year, wholesale inventories are up 2.0 percent against a 3.1 percent decline for sales. Increases for inventories are a positive for GDP calculations but not for the production or employment outlooks nor for business confidence. Heavy inventories were a question during the fourth quarter and may be becoming one for the first quarter as well.
Recent History
Wholesale inventories, due to soft demand, fell each month of the fourth quarter and the reading on the first month of the first quarter is also negative, at a consensus minus 0.1 percent. Wholesale inventory liquidation has been a success, keeping the stock-to-sales ratio for this sector at a moderate 1.32 in both December and November.
Wholesale Inventories to Sales
Let’s investigate the claim “Wholesale inventory liquidation has been a success, keeping the stock-to-sales ratio for this sector at a moderate 1.32 in both December and November.”
Not Alarming Yet
Fred has not yet updated the chart with today’s data. The chart thus reflects the “moderate” inventory to sales ratio of 1.32 in December.
Since 1998 there were only three times in which inventories-to-sales rose to the moderate level of 1.32. In two of those three times, the economy was in recession. The other time was 1998 and the economy was headed to recession thanks to the dotcom bubble.
Anyone recall Cisco’s massive writeoff of routers and the stockpiling of everything fiber-related?
Today we at the “non-success” but “not alarming” yet level of 1.35 that was only exceeded midway through the great recession.
I am relieved. Aren’t you?
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
“Let’s investigate the claim “Wholesale inventory liquidation has been a success, keeping the stock-to-sales ratio for this sector at a moderate 1.32 in both December and November.”
Pathetic.
Bloomberg’s stab at journalism (hopefully) wouldn’t get past a high school paper’s editor.
Not only is the “take” wrong (look at the damn chart above), but Bloomberg failed to take into account the revision. Every report has a revision to prior. With this report (January) December Inventory / Sales revised to 1.33.
Starting with November report and its subsequent revision.
November sales … $442.801 billion …. November inventories … $582.907 billion
December report:
November sales … $441.489 billion …. November inventories … $582.785 billion
December sales … $440.020 billion …. December inventories … $581.979 billion
January report:
December sales … $439.004 billion … December inventories … $582.569 billion
January sales … $433.093 billion …. January inventories … $584.249 billion
Collapsing sales and inventory building??
Business Cycle OVER.
Bloomberg….This is what passes for “business news” these days…
lol…
Misrepresentation and outright fraud from top to bottom.
they obviously have a dog in the hunt so don’t expect transparency
Bloomberg makes its money off of wall street. Wall Street makes its money conning people into buying risky, overpriced financial products. Bloomberg’s just doing its job.